What to verify in a case record
| Field | What to check |
|---|---|
| Brand or plaintiff | Confirm the legal entity and the rights actually alleged; similar names may refer to different parties. |
| Court and case number | Use both to locate the original docket and distinguish separate matters. |
| Recorded dates | Distinguish filing date from ingestion and observation dates. |
| Law-firm and IP-type labels | Read inferred labels as research leads and verify them against the filing. |
| Orders and outcomes | Read the actual order. A complaint record alone does not prove a TRO, an infringement finding or a settlement. |
Open TRO Radar — Chinese interface · Browse public case records. Feature availability and sign-in requirements are shown in the tools.
What the collection covers
21,279 stored IP lawsuit records, observed 2026-10-24 UTC.
These are collection-coverage counts, not complete U.S. litigation totals or counts of confirmed TRO orders. Filing-date quality remains under review. A case record is not a finding that a seller infringed anyone’s rights.
An absent brand or case does not establish that no litigation exists. A prior case does not establish that a current product infringes or predict a future freeze.
Read the counting method and date limitations · Public aggregate JSON.
Use case history alongside product evidence
Review the actual listing, images, rights and authorization. Use a case number to discuss a specific concern with qualified counsel; do not treat a database risk label as a legal outcome.
TRO guide and official procedural sources · Screening tools overview.